My Therapist Keeps Interrupting Me - And Why Your Voice Matters More Than You Think
You're in the middle of explaining something important when your therapist cuts you off with a question, redirects the conversation, or jumps to a conclusion before you've finished your thought. Your immediate reaction? "I must be rambling" or "I'm probably boring them." But here's what the research reveals: cognitive and affective biases affect clinical assessment and decision-making in ways that often function outside conscious awareness, leading therapists to make assumptions and interrupt based on their own psychological triggers rather than clinical necessity.
If you're already dealing with anxiety, depression, or trauma—the very issues that brought you to therapy—your brain is primed to assume that being interrupted means your voice doesn't matter. The reality is more nuanced: while some interrupting reflects poor listening skills or time pressure, research shows it can also indicate unconscious bias, unresolved therapist triggers, or inadequate training in allowing clients to fully express themselves.
The Research: When Listening Gets Hijacked by Bias
Studies on cognitive bias in psychotherapy reveal that therapists' clinical reasoning becomes compromised by unconscious assumptions, particularly when client stories trigger their own unresolved issues or challenge their worldview. Research shows these biases affect assessment and decision-making in ways therapists may not recognize.
Interrupting patterns may reflect therapist discomfort with certain content rather than genuine clinical necessity. When clients discuss topics that activate therapist triggers—such as trauma that mirrors the therapist's own experiences, behaviors they morally disapprove of, or emotions they struggle to tolerate—interrupting can become an unconscious protective mechanism.
Research on the “Wounded Healer” phenomenon shows that many therapists entered the field due to their own psychological struggles and unresolved trauma. When client narratives hit too close to home, therapists may interrupt to avoid their own emotional activation, possibly disguising this as "therapeutic intervention" or "keeping the session focused."
Studies of therapeutic effectiveness reveal that clients who feel heard and allowed to complete their thoughts show significantly better treatment outcomes. Interrupting can damage the therapeutic alliance and interfere with the client's natural processing and insight development.
Why Your Brain Assumes You're "Too Much"
Research consistently shows that individuals seeking mental health treatment often have histories of being silenced, dismissed, or interrupted in significant relationships. If you grew up in a family where your voice wasn't valued, where you were told to "get to the point" or accused of "talking too much," therapist interruptions can trigger deep wounds around your right to be heard.
Studies of trauma survivors reveal particular sensitivity to being cut off or silenced, as these experiences can mirror past power dynamics where their autonomy was violated. When someone in a position of authority (like a therapist) interrupts you, your nervous system may interpret this as a threat, even when the interruption wasn't meant to be dismissive.
The therapeutic relationship creates unique vulnerability because you're paying someone specifically to listen to you. When they interrupt, your brain may conclude that even a professional whose job it is to hear you—finds your voice unworthy of complete attention.
How to Tell the Difference: Therapeutic Redirections vs. Problematic Interrupting
Signs of Appropriate Therapeutic Redirections:
Clinically necessary interruptions:
Interrupting to ensure safety when you mention self-harm or dangerous situations
Redirecting when you're dissociating or becoming overwhelmed beyond your capacity to cope
Asking clarifying questions when they genuinely don't understand what you're communicating
Intervening when you're stuck in repetitive loops that aren't leading to insight
Time management near session end to ensure important topics aren't left hanging
Respectful intervention style:
"I want to pause you there because..." with clear clinical reasoning
"Help me understand this part before you continue..."
"I'm noticing [specific observation] and want to check in about that"
Acknowledging the interruption: "I'm sorry to interrupt, but I need to ask about..."
Signs of Problematic Interrupting:
Bias-driven interruptions:
Cutting you off when discussing certain topics (sexuality, religion, lifestyle choices)
Interrupting to give advice before understanding your full experience
Finishing your sentences based on assumptions rather than what you're actually saying
Redirecting conversations away from content they seem uncomfortable hearing
Jumping to interpretations or diagnoses before you've completed your thought
Pattern recognition:
Consistently interrupting you more when discussing certain subjects
Seeming impatient or fidgety when you take time to articulate something complex
Interrupting to talk about their own experiences or opinions
Cutting you off to move to "more important" topics they prefer
Never acknowledging or apologizing for interruptions
Emotional indicators:
Interruptions that feel dismissive rather than clinically necessary
Body language that suggests impatience or judgment during interruptions
Tone that implies you're taking too long or being inefficient
Facial expressions that don't match their stated support
What to Say When You're Being Cut Off
Script for addressing the pattern: "I've noticed that I get interrupted fairly often in our sessions, and it's making it hard for me to fully express what I'm thinking and feeling. I know I might be sensitive about this, but it's affecting my ability to feel heard. Can we talk about this?"
In the moment of interruption: "I'd like to finish my thought before we move on to that. What I was trying to say is important to me."
OR
"Hold on, I wasn't done explaining that part yet. Can I complete what I was saying?"
When interruptions seem topic-specific: "I notice you tend to redirect me when I talk about [specific topic]. Is there something about that subject that makes it hard to hear me out completely? It's something I really need to explore."
For repeated interruptions: "This is the third time today that I've been cut off mid-sentence. I understand you might have clinical reasons for redirecting, but I need to understand what's happening because it's interfering with my ability to process things."
When Good Clinical Skills Meet Human Triggers
Therapists have genuine intentions to help and aren't consciously trying to silence you. However, good intentions don't eliminate unconscious bias, personal triggers, or inadequate training in allowing clients to fully express themselves before intervening.
Therapists may struggle with tolerating emotional intensity or have been trained in approaches that prioritize cognitive processing over emotional expression. When you're sharing something deeply emotional or taking time to find the right words, their discomfort with the emotional content or pace may lead to premature interruptions.
Workload also contributes to interrupting patterns. Many therapists carry large caseloads and may interrupt to direct conversations toward what they perceive as more therapeutically efficient topics, even when your natural processing pace would be more beneficial.
Protecting Your Right to Be Heard
Document the pattern: Keep brief notes about when you're interrupted: what you were discussing, how the interruption happened, and how it affected your ability to express yourself. Patterns become clearer over time and help you distinguish between isolated incidents and systematic silencing.
Set expectations at session start: "I have some things I really need to talk through completely today. I know you might have questions or want to redirect, but I need to feel like I can finish my thoughts before we explore other angles."
Reality-check your perceptions: Ask trusted friends or family members if you tend to be "long-winded" in conversations. If the feedback is that you communicate normally in other relationships, the interrupting is more likely about therapist issues than your communication style.
Practice assertive responses: Have ready phrases like: "Let me finish this thought," "I need to complete what I was saying," or "That's a good question, but first I want to finish explaining this part."
Troubleshooting Common Scenarios
"My therapist says they interrupt to 'keep me focused'" This can be legitimate or a rationalization. Ask: "Can you help me understand what makes something off-topic? I'd like to complete my thoughts before we decide what's most important to focus on."
"They interrupt when I talk about certain topics" This suggests bias or trigger areas. Try: "I've noticed you tend to redirect me when I discuss [topic]. Is this something you're comfortable working with, or should I find someone who specializes in this area?"
"I feel like I ramble, so maybe the interrupting is helpful" Even if you process verbally, you deserve space to work through your thoughts. Say: "I know I process things by talking through them. Can you give me a few minutes to get my thoughts out before you jump in with questions?"
"They interrupt to give advice before I'm done explaining" This reflects poor listening skills. Address it: "I appreciate that you want to help, but when you give advice before I've finished explaining the situation, I feel like you're responding to part of the story, not the whole picture."
When Interrupting Becomes a Power Dynamic
Power dynamics are always part of psychotherapy.
One person is an expert “in charge” and another is a patient who wants to be healed. As the patient, you are asking the therapist to direct you. Some “directiveness” is a good thing but frequent interruptions are not.
Research shows that interrupting in therapeutic settings can replicate harmful power dynamics from clients' past relationships. If you experienced childhood emotional neglect, authoritarian parenting, or abusive relationships where your voice was silenced, therapist interruptions can trigger deep wounds around your autonomy and worth.
Understanding this dynamic helps you respond more effectively. Instead of assuming the interrupting is about your communication style, you can address it as a pattern that interferes with your healing: "Being interrupted triggers something in me from past relationships where my voice wasn't valued. I need to feel like you want to hear what I have to say completely."
Taking Back Your Voice
Your responsibility:
Communicate clearly when interruptions feel problematic
Distinguish between clinical necessity and personal triggers in their interrupting
Advocate for the space you need to express yourself fully
Decide whether this therapist can provide the listening space you need
Their responsibility:
Allow you to complete thoughts before redirecting or interpreting
Examine their own triggers that might lead to premature interruptions
Explain clinical reasoning when interruptions are genuinely necessary
Adjust their communication style when interrupting becomes problematic
When to work on the interrupting pattern:
Your therapist acknowledges the problem and works to change it
They can explain clinical reasoning for interruptions when they occur
The interrupting decreases after you address it directly
You're making progress despite the interrupting issues
When interrupting is a deal-breaker:
They dismiss your feedback about feeling silenced
The interrupting continues despite multiple conversations about it
You consistently feel unheard or cut off during sessions
The pattern mirrors past relationships where your voice was silenced
The Bottom Line: Your Complete Voice Matters
You deserve therapeutic space where your voice can unfold completely, where your pace of processing is respected, and where interruptions happen only when clinically necessary. Your thoughts don't need to be perfectly organized or efficiently delivered to be worthy of complete attention.
Don't assume that being interrupted means you're talking too much or processing inefficiently. While some redirection can be helpful, systematic interrupting interferes with your natural healing process and can replicate harmful dynamics from your past.
Trust your need to be heard, communicate directly when interrupting becomes problematic, and don't settle for therapeutic relationships that leave you feeling silenced. Space for your full voice exists in therapy—and recognizing problematic interrupting is the first step toward claiming it.
Research Sources
Talbot, C., et al. (2019). “Detecting alliance ruptures: The effects of the therapist’s experience, attachment, empathy and countertransference management skills.” Research in Psychotherapy, 19;22(1):325.
Van Oosterzee, F., et al. (2024). “What Brings You Here?—A Qualitative Study on Why Therapists Become and Remain Therapists.” Professional Psychology, 55 (4), 313–323.
Delgadillo, J., et al. (2018). “Associations between therapists' occupational burnout and their patients' depression and anxiety treatment outcomes.” Depression and Anxiety, 35(9):844-850.
Marazzi, F., et al. (2025). “Transference Assessment in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.” Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10;32(4):e70118.
Eells, T.D. (2001). “Attachment Theory and Psychotherapy Research.” Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10(2):132–135.
Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). "The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development." Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5-44
Schaffer, Y. et al, (2022). “Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Psychotherapy Utilisation and How They Relate to Patient’s Psychotherapeutic Goals”. Healthcare (Basel) 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2228
Gordon, N. S. (2000). “Researching Psychotherapy, the Importance of the Client's View: A Methodological Challenge.” The Qualitative Report, 4(3), 1-20
Moors F., Zech E. (2017). “The Effects of Psychotherapist's and Clients' Interpersonal Behaviors during a First Simulated Session: A Lab Study Investigating Client Satisfaction.” Frontiers in Psychology, (8).
Hagan, W. S., et al. (2021). "Qualitative patient experiences from the Self-Blame and Perspective-Taking Intervention for eating disorders." Journal of Eating Disorders, 14;9:127.
Jannati, Y., et al. (2020). "Self-Blame Attributions of Patients: A Systematic Review Study." Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Zaccari, V., et al. (2024). "Understanding Self-Criticism: A Systematic Review and Synthesis." Frontiers in Psychology, 21(6):455–476.
Šoková, B., et al. (2025). "Breaking the vicious cycles of self-criticism: a qualitative study on the best practices of overcoming one’s inner critic." BMC Psychology, 13, 266.
Capaldi, K., Snorrason, Í. (2024). "Negative treatment of self in socially anxious clients." Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 23(1), 101–121.
Vybiral, Z., et al. (2023). “Negative experiences in psychotherapy from clients’ perspective: A qualitative meta-analysis.” Psychotherapy Research, 34(3):279-292.
Cruciani, G., et al. (2024). “Motivations to become psychotherapists: Beyond the concept of the wounded healer.” Research in Psychotherapy, 26;27(2):808.
Ricks, D., Brannon, G.E. (2023). “It’s real. It’s a thing:” Mental health counselors’ listening exhaustion during COVID-19.” Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare, 7(2):11261.
Newell, J. M., MacNeil, G. A. (2010). "Professional burnout, vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion fatigue: A review of the literature." Best Practices in Mental Health, 6(2), 57-68
Morse, G., et al. (2012). "Burnout in mental health services: A review of the problem and its remediation." Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 39(5), 341-352
Figley, C. R. (2002). "Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists' chronic lack of self care." Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(11), 1433-1441
F. Datz, et al. (2015). “Countertransference Triggered Activity in Treatment. Good, Bad or Useful?” British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, 11(9): 1-11.
Prasko, J., et al. (2025). “The use and misuse of power in cognitive-behavioral therapy, schema therapy, and supervision.” Neuroendocrinology Letters, 28;46(1):33-48.